Energy Solution Comparison
Evidence-based analysis of energy options for industrial operations
Solution Comparison
Our approach delivers superior performance across all critical metrics:
| Metric | IO Mega Energy | Grid Connection | Solar + Storage | Natural Gas | Traditional Nuclear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment Time | 18-24 months | 7-15 years | 2-3 years | 3-5 years | 10-15 years |
| Carbon Emissions | Zero | Varies (grid mix) | Zero (intermittent) | High | Zero |
| Availability | 24/7 Baseload | 24/7 (if connected) | Intermittent | 24/7 | 24/7 |
| Cost Certainty | Fixed multi-year PPA | Market volatility | High upfront + storage | Commodity risk | High upfront |
| Regulatory Risk | Transferred to us | Client bears risk | Client bears risk | Carbon pricing risk | Extreme regulatory risk |
Traditional Nuclear: A Cautionary Tale
Traditional large-scale nuclear projects have consistently experienced massive cost overruns and delays:
Flamanville 3 (France)
Original Budget: €3.3 billion
Current Cost: €13.2 billion
Overrun: 300%
Status: Years behind schedule
Hinkley Point C (UK)
Projected Cost: £46 billion
Timeline: Continuous delays
Strike Price: £92.50/MWh (2012 prices)
Risk: Taxpayer and ratepayer burden
Our manufacturing-based approach eliminates these risks through factory production, standardization, and proven modular deployment.